Can machine learning and AI make programmers obsolete? Can AI make software coding and debugging a thing of the past?

Last Updated: 02.07.2025 18:38

Can machine learning and AI make programmers obsolete? Can AI make software coding and debugging a thing of the past?

Let’s use the agent to see if it can search at least, when it doesn’t know?

And presto goes Claude, the clueless junior-dev (it also botched correctly showing //):

And let’s use the latest, extra-capable model 4.1 from OpenAPI. The result:

“We Brought the Future Back to Earth”: SpaceX Dragon Returns With 6,700 Lbs of Cutting-Edge Robots From Deep-Space Mission - Rude Baguette

To the reader/asker:

Claude boy, how do I do division and modulus in OCaml?

As usual, I’ll make my point backed by verifiable examples.

Is it a viable option to open an international Business Process outsourcing (BPO) company in India, considering the already existing abundance of such companies in the country?

Your software developer job is safe for at least the next 100 years.

Let’s ask Claude Sonnet 3.5, which is quite the advanced model (at par with Deepseek V3 R1 and GPT 4o) a very simple question:

Ah. Claude Claude Claude.

Nintendo Switch 2 pre-order: your last chance to reserve the console in the US - The Shortcut | Matt Swider

You can do modulus with %. In fact, it’s the standard way to do it! (See command 17). And mod is deprecated (command 18):

I don’t think so Claudeboy.

Re——-aaaaalllllly.

Apple iPhone 17: Key Design Upgrade Promised In New Leak - Forbes

And ever so dutifully, Claude reports:

Here’s the proof :

Now, let’s think about that for a second or two. Such an elementary matter and such egregious error of omission!

Has anyone experienced an out of the body experience, as a child, years before you had ever heard the term or understood the implications?

And hey Claude? There’s a reserved float division /. if both numbers are floats, for sure (19) but so can one use // even though both are integers (20):

Agent, are you sure???? You’re lying again, aren’t you?